Here for humans who want to human more humanely.

Simone Seol

Here for humans who want to human more humanely.

Get emails from Simone:

Why I’m leaving the world of coaching

Aurora Borealis in High Latitudes from the book William MacKenzie’s National Encyclopedia (1891)

For nearly 15 years, I’ve called myself a coach.

I have trained, taught, and yes, coached coaches.

For the longest time, I had the purest love for it.

And I am leaving this world behind.

I wanted to talk about why.


Let’s zoom out a little bit.

And take a look at historical context.

The whole field, and construct, of coaching couldn’t exist without psychology and psychotherapy having come first.


Coaching, like psychotherapy, is a complicated field.

It’s complicated because, in the Western world, these are often the only options someone has to get help when they’re in pain.

This is not a small thing. Because there is a lot of pain in the Western world.

And they couldn’t have survived this far if they didn’t sometimes work, and work vitally and profoundly.

I have said this before, and I am happy to repeat this: I credit people who call themselves coaches with saving my life. They really did. And I know I am far from alone.

Many therapists and coaches do literally life-saving work. (And many others don’t do much, and many others yet do quite the opposite.)

The fields of both therapy and coaching are sometimes self-selected into by people who are selfless, compassionate, and profoundly moved by the suffering of other humans. Other times, not so much.

Sometimes, the practitioners of therapy or coaching are incredibly skilled at their craft. Other times, not so much.

For many who are genuinely skilled, their dedication to it comes way before their desire for money or status, if they care for those things at all. I know both coaches and therapists who basically live like ascetics, and are content with their lives just helping people.

To make black & white generalization about either of these fields is difficult.

These fields do a lot of good. And they do some not-good.

Because I experienced firsthand so much of good in it, and met some of the most generous and kind-hearted people in it (including so many of my teachers, colleagues and clients), I carried the torch for it and defended it for as long as I did.

But over the past few years, it has become increasingly difficult to do so, as I learned more history, reflected on the realities of the world, and delved deeper into my own spiritual roots.


Doing even the smallest amount of research into the roots of Western psychiatry and psychotherapy is to be horrified by its racism, colonialism, and violence.

Perhaps even more horrifying to contemplate than the violence that is visible for all to see is the violence of what has been cleanly erased, exterminated, wiped off the map, to make for the advancement of these Western institutions.

What has been erased can’t make sounds.

(The sounds of my great-grandmother throwing a knife at the door to cast out wayward spirits. The sounds of grandmother rattling her shaman’s bells.)

It is from the “clean slate” of this erasure that the field of coaching is born, breathless with the promise of 20th century, Cold War-era, American capitalism:

YOU can get rich. YOU can be hot. YOU can be happy. YOU can hack your way out of aging, unhappiness, and loneliness.

All you need to do is to improve yourself. Let us show you how! Here’s where to make the deposit.

Both coaching and therapy were created, popularized, and represented — still — at the highest levels by white people (mostly men), in post-colonial, post-industrial times, growing in conjunction with capitalism, with the centers of intellectual influence coinciding with global centers of economic and military power (e.g.US, Western Europe.)


In the big scheme of things, I’m small fish, swimming in small waters. And from my view, I have come to see how this shows up in every crevice of what I could observe.

(1) The fact that there is almost no coaching “practice” that hasn’t been appropriated, multiple times over, from an indigenous tradition.

Borrowing and adaption between cultures is entirely normal and healthy.

An utter lack of acknowledgment or crediting because of the enormous power differential between cultures, no sense of right relationship, and no appropriate sense of how to be in relationship with lineage… is another.

Take, for example, the Eastern practice of “mindfulness” — the idea of observing your own thoughts from a neutral place. This was never, ever meant to be in service of individual happiness, productivity, and wealth. And in Eastern traditions, it was always, always grounded in the necessity of moral action and serving the needs of the community.

I could give a hundred other examples.

(2) The way that default coaching “goals” and aspirations fit so snugly with capitalist values that are destroying the Earth

The quickest and easiest possible accumulation of individual wealth, growth at all cost, the celebration of consumerism, individual happiness (an oxymoron), what I call the “Amazon Next Day Delivery” approach to inner peace and contentment…

… a compartmentalized vision of “wellness”, productivity, an ideal of physical beauty that Hitler would salivate over (Aryan-blonde, blue-eyed, slim, youthful and fertile)…

(3) And, as a corollary, a pathological avoidance of things that are decidedly NOT capitalism-friendly

Slowness, aging, pain, illness, decay, illness, loss, darkness, silence, liminality — all things that were honored, and considered to contain inherent value and wisdom by Indigenous traditions.

(4) The fact that the vast majority of coaching businesses do not even make passing references to systemic and collective issues, and, in fact, go out of their way to avoid them.

Because it’s “unprofessional.” “Irrelevant.” “Low vibrations.” “Divisive.”

And, ultimately, “bad for business.”

(5) The dire lack of eldership — despite the overabundance of self-professed “experts.”

All of the above contribute to an environment in which enormous sum of money are always being cycled through while the collective is, somehow, becoming more and more impoverished both materially and spiritually.

There was a moment when I clearly saw that the work of “redeeming” or “changing the system from the inside” was an illusion.

That’s when I knew: I was out.

… human interdependence and cooperation, rather than individualism and commodification must be at the heart of the psychology of liberation, which should be about empowering people to change institutions and radically transform social structures, rather than adjusting and submitting to the status quo while making a profit. — Hamza Hamouchene


A friend asked me what I would call myself, if I am no longer calling myself a coach of any kind.

My answer was simple; HUMAN.

Because, that, I am.

You may call me teacher, as I intend to go on teaching. Oh, there is so much to teach.

If you still want to call me a coach, that is okay, too. I am not offended. It is a name I was proud to go by for many years, and I am okay to still be called it. It is part of my makeup and lineage.

If you want to know what self-cultivation and healing looks like outside of the broken cultures and institutions of the Western world, read books by people like Malidona Patrice Somé, Jiddu Krishnamurti, Thich Nhat Hanh, Robin Wall Kimmerer, Tyson Yunkaporta, Cole Arthur Riley, Tricia Hersey, Tamela J. Gordon.

The list could be miles and miles long. These are some names I could throw off the top of my head, just the tip of the tip of the tip of the iceberg.


There’s no moral purity here.

I collude with white supremacy and capitalism by virtue of being alive in 2024, despite ongoing experiments to more responsibly steward what I can.

We’re all wrestling with complicated history and constructs and doing our best.

There are coaches of color doing groundbreaking work, and white coaches who are actually radical activists in disguise, doing some of the most courageous work I know. (I bow down to you.)

Coach, Schmoach, whatever… these are just words.

We will be known by the seeds we sow in the world, not what it says on our business card (or, nowadays, Instagram bio, I guess).

Whatever you call yourself, I don’t care.

If you take the time to hang out with me, read my words, and find my thinking useful, I am grateful to you. And you are warmly welcome in my world, always.

Starting in 2025, I’m taking a fixed salary.

Outside of that + my company’s basic operating costs, I’m donating the rest of our profits.

Here’s why I’m making this decision.

For the second half of this year, I’ve been taking sabbatical. And I’ve had the opportunity to do nothing but to think deeply.

And one of the realizations I’ve arrived at is this: we can live in either one of two modes: what I call the “hungry ghost” mode, or in spiritual wholeness. 

Hungry ghost

“Hungry ghost” is a term that comes from Buddhism and Chinese folks religion.

The way I use this term colloquially, I am referring to a way of being that says: more, more, more, more. Never enough.

It is animated by an insatiable, ever-deepening gnawing existential void inside that nothing can fill. 

The void plays host to an endless array of addictions — to more work, more money, more “growth”, more popularity, more comfort, more convenience, more entertainment, more dopamine, more adrenaline, more power.

More more more more more.

And, paradoxically, even when you accumulate and hoard more and more, the void doesn’t actually get filled. It somehow gets deeper, darker, more terrifying.

So then the addiction becomes even more frenzied. So then you get even more addicted to the chase. Then the void grows even deeper. And so on it goes…

In Buddhism, hungry ghosts, or pretas, are beings who are tormented by desire that can never be sated. (source)

The void is the very engine of consumerism (and so much of “business growth”). 

The bigger the people’s void, the more they consume (and “work” a lot of the time), and the more alienated they grow from their own souls, and disconnected they become from everything life-giving, connective, and sacred. 

Hungry ghost syndrome is not new to humanity — insatiable greed has always existed — but it has been inflamed to grotesque proportions and normalized amongst the populace to a terrifying degree thanks to capitalism.

Spiritual wholeness

The alternative to “hungry ghost” syndrome is spiritual wholeness.

You can have one, or the other. But not both.  And there is nothing in between. No such thing as a middle ground. Pick one.

Spiritual wholeness is the opposite of the perpetual state of addiction that attempts to fill the void within. Consumerism, addiction, and alienation meet their end in spiritual wholeness. 

The critical ingredient to spiritual wholeness that indigenous wisdom traditions have known for all ages, all over the world, is right relationship

Right relationship with ourselves, our communities, with non-human living beings, with the Earth, and with unseen energies.

Right relationship with knowledge, money and material things (not “possessions,” since Buddhism teaches me that there is no such thing). 

Right relationship between two beings requires attention, respect, and balance.

And one thing I have come to reflect on deeply is that excess is antithetical to right relationship

  • What is enough — the opposite of excess?
  • What does it mean to steward (not “own”) enoughness?

Enoughness is not a fixed state. 

What is enough for a healthy person is not the same as what is enough for a sick person. What is enough for an infant is not the same as what is enoughs for a teenager, which is not the same as what is enough for an elderly person. What is enough in a state of crisis is not the same as what is enough in a state of calm. 

So it is a dynamic, moving idea. 

And yet… we must never cease asking, “what is a balance that constitutes enoughness? And how do we meet it wisely?”

Otherwise, we cease to be in right relationship. 

So, in 2025, I decided to enter into an experiment.

I call it an experiment, because everything is an experiment. 

We try things, we learn and grow from them, and we try things differently, better —  hopefully — based on the new knowledge we’ll glean. I don’t know what I’ll learn from this upcoming experiment that will make future experiments different. 

But for now, here is what I am committed to.

I am taking a fixed salary. 

It is a salary that will allow my family to live comfortably. 

Not extravagantly, but with all of our basic needs AND many comforts met, while allowing us to save some for our future, while also allowing us to exercise a bit of generosity in our private lives. 

(And no, I’m not sharing this number — on purpose. I have no problem sharing numbers. 

But I feel that, once the number is known, it becomes distracting. Some may think it’s too much, some may think it’s too little, and more importantly, it may, for many, unconsciously become a kind of cutoff line at which people are “allowed to” make similar decisions. And none of that is useful, because the number itself is not the point. 

The “enoughness” number will be different for everyone, and it will be different even for me at different stages of my life.)

My company also has ongoing expenses. My team members need to be paid, and there are tech expenses, taxes, etc. 

And if we have profits on top of that — and I’m honestly not sure how much of them we’ll have, given that I’m also intending to move at a much slower pace and making significant changes to my business, leaving behind many features that used to reliably bring in “big money” — I intend to donate them to nonprofit organizations that support decolonization and climate justice.

I thought long and hard about whether to talk about this publicly at all.

Because, at the end, I’m not doing this for anyone but for myself. (Remember the whole thing about spiritual health? It’s MY spiritual health I’m choosing.) 

But ultimately, I chose to speak about it publicly, because I don’t think I would’ve thought to move in this direction if it weren’t for indigenous, Confucian, Taoist and Buddhist teachers of mine who shared wisdom and stories of their own lives and lineages that exemplified what it means to live in right relationship, away from capitalism’s dictates.

And I think that matters — sharing of stories. If it could support and embolden at least one other person to move in similar directions, I would be very happy.

This is an uncertain and perilous time for many across the world.

The more of us there are who are connected to the health of our spirits, the better hope we have of creating a world that is safe for our descendants to inhabit.

I’m Simone Seol

I am here for humans who want to human more humanely.

Get emails from Simone: